Consequences of Acid Strength and Solvation in Catalysis Mediated by Ion-pair Transition States

2012 Spring Symposium

 
Enrique Igle­sia
Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing
Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley and Chem­i­cal Sci­ences Divi­sion
E.O. Lawrence Berke­ley Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ry


Abstract — The rate and selec­tiv­i­ty of reac­tions cat­alyzed by acids depend on the sta­bil­i­ty of ion-pairs at tran­si­tion states that medi­ate kinet­i­cal­ly-rel­e­vant steps. Rates and selec­tiv­i­ties for alka­nol dehy­dra­tion and homolo­ga­tion, alkene and cycloalkene iso­mer­iza­tion, and alkox­ide scis­sion and hydro­gen trans­fer on poly­ox­omet­a­late and zeolitic acids show that sen­si­tiv­i­ty to acid strength reflects dif­fer­ences in the amount and dif­fuse­ness of the charge in the rel­e­vant pre­cur­sors and the tran­si­tion states. The effects of sol­va­tion by con­fine­ment on rates and selec­tiv­i­ties depend, in turn, on their respec­tive dif­fer­ences in size. The known struc­tures of these acids allow rig­or­ous com­par­isons between exper­i­ment and the­o­ry, which con­firm the mech­a­nis­tic inter­pre­ta­tions of rate data and the rel­e­vance of depro­to­na­tion ener­gies as the­o­ret­i­cal prox­ies of acid strength. These stud­ies and insights sug­gest a rig­or­ous reac­tiv­i­ty-based rank­ing of acid strength that can be used to assess the strength of sol­id acids with uncer­tain or non-uni­form struc­tures.

Speaker’s Biog­ra­phy — Enrique Igle­sia is the Theodore Ver­meulen Chair in Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley and a Fac­ul­ty Senior Sci­en­tist in the Lawrence Berke­ley Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ry. He received his B.S. from Prince­ton Uni­ver­si­ty and his Ph.D. degree from Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty with Pro­fes­sor Michel Boudart and joined the Berke­ley fac­ul­ty in 1993 after 12 years in research and lead­er­ship posi­tions at the Cor­po­rate Research Labs of Exxon. He has served as Edi­tor-in-Chief of Jour­nal of Catal­y­sis and is the Pres­i­dent of the North Amer­i­can Catal­y­sis Soci­ety and the Direc­tor of the Berke­ley Catal­y­sis Cen­ter. He has co-authored more than 300 arti­cles in the lead­ing jour­nals in chem­istry and chem­i­cal engi­neer­ing and is a co-inven­tor in 38 U.S. patents. He is a mem­ber of the Nation­al Acad­e­my of Engi­neer­ing and a Fel­low of the Amer­i­can Chem­i­cal Soci­ety. His research has been rec­og­nized with the Somor­jai and Olah Awards of the Amer­i­can Chem­i­cal Soci­ety, the Award for Excel­lence in Nat­ur­al Gas Con­ver­sion, the Alpha Chi Sig­ma and Wil­helm awards of the Amer­i­can Insti­tute of Chem­i­cal Engi­neers, the Emmett and Bur­well Awards of the Catal­y­sis Soci­ety, the Tan­abe Prize in Acid-Base Catal­y­sis, the Cana­di­an Chem­i­cal Soci­ety Cross Cana­da Lec­ture­ship, and the Fran­cois Gault Award of the Euro­pean Fed­er­a­tion of Catal­y­sis Soci­eties. His research inter­ests include the syn­the­sis and struc­tur­al and mech­a­nis­tic char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of nov­el inor­gan­ic solids use­ful as cat­a­lysts in chem­i­cal reac­tions of crit­i­cal impor­tance in ener­gy con­ver­sion, sus­tain­able syn­the­sis of ener­gy car­ri­ers and petro­chem­i­cals, and pol­lu­tion pre­ven­tion and envi­ron­men­tal con­trol.

Formic Acid Decomposition on Bulk Metal Catalysts

2012 Spring Symposium

 
Yadan Tang, Charles A. Roberts, Israel Wachs
Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing
Lehigh Uni­ver­si­ty


Abstract — Mea­sured trends in cat­alyt­ic reac­tiv­i­ty over vary­ing met­al cat­a­lysts have been used to facil­i­tate the opti­miza­tion of bimetal­lic catalysts.[1] An impor­tant exam­ple of such a trend is the Sachtler-Fahren­fort vol­cano curve, in which reac­tiv­i­ty of met­al sur­faces for formic acid decom­po­si­tion is plot­ted against the sta­bil­i­ty of inter­me­di­ates, i.e. the bulk heat of for­ma­tion of the for­mate on a spe­cif­ic met­al surface.[2] It is ques­tion­able, how­ev­er, to cor­re­late a bulk prop­er­ty with cat­alyt­ic reac­tiv­i­ty, a process that occurs exclu­sive­ly at the sur­face. The cur­rent study inves­ti­gates the cor­re­la­tion between formic acid decom­po­si­tion and reac­tiv­i­ty of bulk met­al cat­a­lysts (i.e. Fe, Ru, Pd, Pt, Au, Ag, Ni, Co, and Cu) using mod­ern tech­niques such as in situ dif­fuse reflectance infrared Fouri­er trans­form spec­troscopy (DRIFTS) and tem­per­a­ture pro­grammed sur­face reac­tion (TPSR) spec­troscopy. In situ DRIFTS mon­i­tors the for­mate struc­ture on the sur­face of bulk met­al cat­a­lysts dur­ing the adsorp­tion and decom­po­si­tion of formic acid. By uti­liz­ing a tem­per­a­ture ramp­ing pro­ce­dure, in situ DRIFTS also pro­vides insights into ther­mal sta­bil­i­ty of adsorbed for­mates. TPSR spec­troscopy detects the tem­per­a­ture at which the peak activ­i­ty for decom­po­si­tion of the adsorbed for­mates occurs, there­fore pro­vid­ing a mea­sure of the reac­tiv­i­ty of the met­al sur­face. In situ DRIFTS and TPSR spec­troscopy exper­i­ments agree with the pre­vi­ous report­ed find­ing that the decom­po­si­tion of HCOOH pro­ceeds via two steps: 1) for­ma­tion of sur­face adsorbed for­mate (HCOO-M) inter­me­di­ates; and 2) decom­po­si­tion of for­mate inter­me­di­ates into gas phase prod­ucts such as CO, CO2, H2 and H2O.[3] The for­mate struc­ture on var­i­ous met­al cat­a­lysts are iden­ti­fied and assigned based on a pre­vi­ous study on formic acid via high res­o­lu­tion elec­tron ener­gy loss spec­troscopy (HREELs).[3] The cur­rent study finds that the for­mate species on Fe, Ru, Pd, Pt and Au are bridged; on Co and Ni are mon­oden­tate; and on Cu and Ag are con­vert­ed from mon­oden­tate to bridged at high­er tem­per­a­ture in agree­ment with HREE­Ls work on both Cu(100) and Ag(110).[4] The TPSR decom­po­si­tion tem­per­a­tures, Tp, were plot­ted ver­sus the bulk heat of for­ma­tion of for­mates report­ed by Sachtler and Farenfort[2]. Rather than a vol­cano trend, the plot is observed to con­tain two dis­tinct lin­ear rela­tion­ships indi­cat­ing that trends in reac­tiv­i­ty of met­als should be eval­u­at­ed based on sur­face prop­er­ties rather than bulk.

[1] Jacob­sen, Claus J. H., Dahl, S., Clausen, Bjerne S., Bahn, S., Logadot­tir, A., and Nørskov, Jens K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 8404 (2001).
[2] Sachtler, W.M.H., and Fahren­fort, J., in “Pro­ceed­ings, 2nd Inter­na­tion­al Con­gress on Catal­y­sis, Paris, 1960,” p.831. Tech­nip, Paris, 1961.
[3] Colum­bia, M.R., Thiel, P.A. J. Eelec­tro­an­a­lyt­i­cal Chem. 369, 1–14 (1994).
[4] Sexton,B.A. Surf. Sci., 88, 319 (1979).

Speaker’s Biog­ra­phy — Yadan Tang is a grad­u­ate stu­dent in Chem­istry at Lehigh Uni­ver­si­ty, advised by Pro­fes­sor Israel Wachs. She received her B.S. in Mate­r­i­al Sci­ence and Engi­neer­ing Depart­ment at East Chi­na Univ. of Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy in 2006. She received her M.S. in Chem­istry Depart­ment at Lehigh Univ in 2010. Since joined in Wachs group in 2011, she has been involved in formic acid decom­po­si­tion on bulk met­al cat­a­lyst and sup­port­ed met­al oxides on zeo­lite.

Multifunctional Nanostructured Catalysts: From New Synthetic Methods to their Potential Applications

2012 Spring Symposium

 
Tewodros Ase­fa
Depart­ment of Chem­istry and Chem­i­cal Biol­o­gy, and Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal and Bio­chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing
Rut­gers, The State Uni­ver­si­ty of New Jer­sey


Abstract — The devel­op­ment of nov­el nano­ma­te­ri­als with unique struc­tures enables fun­da­men­tal stud­ies at the nanoscale, which can lead to var­i­ous inter­est­ing appli­ca­tions. In this talk, efforts by my research group over the last few years on three dif­fer­ent, but relat­ed, areas will be dis­cussed. In the first part, I will describe how the ratio­nal assem­bly of mul­ti­func­tion­al nanos­truc­tured mate­ri­als com­posed of met­al oxides, car­bon nanofibers, metal­lic nanopar­ti­cles, organocat­a­lysts or organometal­lic com­plex­es leads to nov­el nanocat­a­lysts for effi­cient syn­er­gis­tic cat­alyt­ic reac­tions or for mul­ti-step in one-pot tan­dem reac­tions of var­i­ous organ­ic com­pounds. The effects of how two or mul­ti­ple cat­alyt­ic groups that are co-placed with­in nanoscale cav­i­ties do syn­er­gis­ti­cal­ly cat­alyze reac­tions will be demon­strat­ed. Fur­ther­more, by plac­ing these cat­a­lysts in fixed bed reac­tors, con­tin­u­ous reac­tions to selec­tive prod­ucts has been demon­strat­ed.

Speaker’s Biog­ra­phy — Ted­dy Ase­fa was born in Ethiopia where he also com­plet­ed his B.Sc. degree in Chem­istry with dis­tinc­tion in 1992 from Addis Aba­ba Uni­ver­si­ty, Ethiopia. He came to the Unit­ed States as a Ful­bright Schol­ar in 1996 to do his grad­u­ate study. After a brief stay at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Delaware, he joined the Insti­tute for Lasers, Pho­ton­ics and Bio­pho­ton­ics (ILPB) at the State Uni­ver­si­ty of New York at Buf­fa­lo to com­plete his M.Sc. in Chem­istry in 1998 with Pro­fes­sor Paras N. Prasad. Ted­dy, then, went to Toron­to, Cana­da to com­plete his Ph.D. at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to in 2002 with Pro­fes­sor Geof­frey A. Ozin. While at Toron­to, he has co-invent­ed new class­es of nanocom­pos­ite mate­ri­als called Peri­od­ic Meso­porous Organosil­i­cas (PMOs) that are cur­rent­ly draw­ing wide range of inter­est world-wide. He was then an invit­ed Miller Fel­low­ship nom­i­nee by Pro­fes­sor Pei­dong Yang at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley and a post-doc­tor­al fel­low at McGill Uni­ver­si­ty with Pro­fes­sor R. Bruce Lennox. Ted­dy then joined the fac­ul­ty at Syra­cuse Uni­ver­si­ty in the sum­mer of 2005 and served as an Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor of Chem­istry for four years before mov­ing to Rut­gers as an Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor. He is cur­rent­ly a joint Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor in the Depart­ment of Chem­istry and Chem­i­cal Biol­o­gy and the Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal and Bio­chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at Rut­gers Uni­ver­si­ty at New Brunswick. He is also a mem­ber of the Rut­gers Insti­tute for Mate­ri­als, Devices, and Nan­otech­nol­o­gy (IAMDN) and the Rut­gers Ener­gy Insti­tute (REI). In Decem­ber 2009, he helped putting togeth­er the new­ly formed Rut­gers Catal­y­sis Research Cen­ter (RCRC). His group at Rut­gers is involved in the devel­op­ment of syn­thet­ic meth­ods to a wide array of func­tion­al nano­ma­te­ri­als and the inves­ti­ga­tion of their poten­tial appli­ca­tions in catal­y­sis, tar­get­ed deliv­ery of drugs at spe­cif­ic cells, nanocy­to­tox­i­c­i­ty, solar-cells, and envi­ron­men­tal reme­di­a­tion. He is an NSF CAREER Awardee, holds NSF Cre­ativ­i­ty Award, and is a recent Nation­al Sci­ence Foun­da­tion Amer­i­can Com­pet­i­tive­ness Fel­low (NSF-ACIF) for 2010, and also is a recip­i­ent of mul­ti­ple fed­er­al and local research grants and also serves as a pan­elist for sev­er­al fed­er­al and inter­na­tion­al agen­cies. He was recent­ly award­ed the Rut­gers Board of Trustees Fel­low­ships for Schol­ar­ly excel­lence, the high­est hon­or giv­en to young pro­fes­sors at Rut­gers.

Selective Hydrodeoxygenation of m-Cresol over Bifunctional Metal-Acid Catalysts

2012 Spring Symposium

 
Andrew Fos­ter, Phuong Do, Jing­guang Chen and Raul F. Lobo
Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal and Bio­mol­e­c­u­lar Engi­neer­ing
Uni­ver­si­ty of Delaware


Abstract — Upgrad­ing of bio­mass derived pyrol­y­sis oil is nec­es­sary to pro­duce liq­uid fuels that can seam­less­ly be inte­grat­ed with the cur­rent trans­porta­tion fuel infra­struc­ture and hydrodeoxy­gena­tion (HDO) is one of the most effec­tive meth­ods to accom­plish this task. In this talk we will describe the HDO of m-cresol (3-methylphe­nol) inves­ti­gate as a mod­el reac­tion for the HDO of the phe­no­lic frac­tion of pyrol­y­sis oil of lig­no­cel­lu­losic bio­mass. To facil­i­tate selec­tive removal of oxy­gen with­out fur­ther hydro­gena­tion of unsat­u­rat­ed C-C bonds, exper­i­ments were con­duct­ed at low hydro­gen pres­sures. Kinet­ic stud­ies in a plug-flow reac­tor show that toluene can be selec­tive­ly pro­duced from m-cresol over a Pt/γ-Al2O3 cat­a­lyst at pres­sures as low as 0.5 atm H2 and 533 K. A reac­tion net­work has been devel­oped based on inves­ti­ga­tion of the reac­tions of m-cresol, and the observed reac­tion prod­ucts and inter­me­di­ates over Pt/γ-Al2O3 and oth­er sup­ports. m-Cresol HDO pro­ceeds by a bifunc­tion­al mech­a­nism, requir­ing met­al-cat­alyzed hydro­gena­tion of the aro­mat­ic ring fol­lowed by acid-cat­alyzed dehy­dra­tion. The degree of hydro­gena­tion of the pool of inter­me­di­ates pri­or to dehy­dra­tion large­ly deter­mines the resul­tant prod­uct dis­tri­b­u­tion. The effect of the addi­tion of a sec­ond met­al (Ni and Co) on cat­a­lysts activ­i­ty is also inves­ti­gat­ed. It is shown that selec­tive pro­duc­tion of toluene requires the dehy­dra­tion to occur before sat­u­ra­tion of the aro­mat­ic ring.

Speak­er Biog­ra­phy — Raul F. Lobo is pro­fes­sor of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Delaware and Direc­tor of the Cen­ter for Cat­alyt­ic Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy. His research inter­ests span the devel­op­ment of nov­el porous mate­ri­als for catal­y­sis and sep­a­ra­tions, the chem­istry of zeo­lites at high tem­per­a­tures, the devel­op­ment of nov­el pho­to­cat­a­lysts and the sci­en­tif­ic aspects of cat­a­lyst syn­the­sis. He has pub­lished over one hun­dred ref­er­eed reports and he is co-inven­tor in three US patents. He obtained his under­grad­u­ate degree in Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cos­ta Rica and lat­er moved to Cal­i­for­nia to pur­sue grad­u­ate stud­ies in Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at Cal­tech. He worked for one year at Los Alam­os Nation­al Lab­o­ra­to­ry, New Mex­i­co as a post­doc­tor­al fel­low and start­ed his aca­d­e­m­ic career at the Cen­ter for Cat­alyt­ic Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy, Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing, Uni­ver­si­ty of Delaware in 1995.

Engineering Molecular Transformations over Supported Catalysts for Sustainable Energy Conversion

2012 Spring Symposium

 
Matthew Neu­rock
Depart­ments of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing and Chem­istry
Uni­ver­si­ty of Vir­ginia


Abstract — Future strate­gies for ener­gy pro­duc­tion will undoubt­ed­ly require process­es and mate­ri­als that can effi­cient­ly con­vert sus­tain­able resources into fuels and chem­i­cals. While nature’s enzymes ele­gant­ly inte­grate high­ly active cen­ters togeth­er with adap­tive nanoscale envi­ron­ments in order to exquis­ite­ly con­trol the cat­alyt­ic trans­for­ma­tion of mol­e­cules to spe­cif­ic prod­ucts, they are dif­fi­cult to incor­po­rate into large scale indus­tri­al process­es and lim­it­ed in terms of their sta­bil­i­ty. The design of more robust het­ero­ge­neous cat­alyt­ic mate­ri­als that can mim­ic enzyme behav­ior, how­ev­er, has been hin­dered by our lim­it­ed under­stand­ing of how such trans­for­ma­tions pro­ceed over inor­gan­ic mate­ri­als. The tremen­dous advances in ab ini­tio the­o­ret­i­cal meth­ods along with high per­for­mance com­put­ing that have occurred over the past two decades pro­vide unprece­dent­ed abil­i­ty to track these mol­e­c­u­lar trans­for­ma­tions and how they pro­ceed at spe­cif­ic sites and with­in par­tic­u­lar envi­ron­ments. This infor­ma­tion togeth­er with the unique abil­i­ties to fol­low such trans­for­ma­tions spec­tro­scop­i­cal­ly is enabling the design of unique atom­ic sur­face ensem­bles and nanoscale reac­tion envi­ron­ment that can effi­cient­ly cat­alyze spe­cif­ic mol­e­c­u­lar trans­for­ma­tions. This talk presents the advances that have occurred with­in catal­y­sis that have enabled this evo­lu­tion of mol­e­c­u­lar engi­neer­ing and dis­cuss its appli­ca­tions to ener­gy con­ver­sion strate­gies as well as chem­i­cal syn­the­ses. More specif­i­cal­ly, we will dis­cuss the appli­ca­tion to selec­tive oxi­da­tion and hydro­gena­tion over sup­port­ed met­als for bio­mass con­ver­sion as well as C-C bond for­ma­tion reac­tions.

Speaker’s Biog­ra­phy — Matt Neu­rock is the Alice M. and Guy A. Wil­son Pro­fes­sor of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing and Pro­fes­sor of Chem­istry at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Vir­ginia. He joined the fac­ul­ty in Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Vir­ginia in 1995 after receiv­ing his Ph.D. from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Delaware and work­ing as a post­doc­tor­al Fel­low at the Eind­hoven Uni­ver­si­ty of Tech­nol­o­gy and at the DuPont Cor­po­rate Catal­y­sis Cen­ter. He has received var­i­ous awards for his research in com­pu­ta­tion­al catal­y­sis and mol­e­c­u­lar reac­tion engi­neer­ing includ­ing the 2007 R.H. Wil­helm Award in Chem­i­cal Reac­tion Engi­neer­ing from the Amer­i­can Insti­tute of Chem­i­cal Engi­neers and the 2005 Paul H. Emmett Award in Fun­da­men­tal Catal­y­sis from the North Amer­i­can Catal­y­sis Soci­ety. He has co-authored 200 papers, two patents and two books. He is cur­rent­ly an edi­tor for the Jour­nal of Catal­y­sis and serves on the edi­to­r­i­al board for Applied Catal­y­sis A: Gen­er­al, Elec­tro­catal­y­sis, and the inter­na­tion­al advi­so­ry board, Chem­CatChem.

Commercialisation of a Novel Methyl Methacrylate Process – Catalyst Design and Development

2012 Spring Symposium

 
David W John­son
Lucite Inter­na­tion­al UK Ltd

Abstract — A brief out­line of Lucite International’s new “Alpha” methyl methacry­late tech­nol­o­gy is described includ­ing process scale up and the first exploita­tion in Sin­ga­pore in late 2008. The tech­nol­o­gy was devel­oped from 0.5g/h lab scale to 500g/h pilot and thence direct­ly to 12te/h com­mer­cial scale. The plant was com­mis­sioned from first intro­duc­tion of chem­i­cals to 100% rate with­in 3 weeks and cur­rent­ly oper­ates at over 16te/h with excep­tion­al reli­a­bil­i­ty.

Two cat­alyt­ic steps are key to the tech­nol­o­gy. In the first, car­bon monox­ide, eth­yl­ene and methanol are react­ed in solu­tion with a nov­el pal­la­di­um phos­phine cat­a­lyst which gives methyl pro­pi­onate in 99.9+% selec­tiv­i­ty in a con­tin­u­ous process at ppm lev­el pal­la­di­um con­cen­tra­tions at 100C and 10bar total pres­sure. The cat­a­lyst activ­i­ty and life is very sen­si­tive to oper­at­ing con­di­tions. After exten­sive process devel­op­ment, activ­i­ties of 15,000 moles/mole Pd/h and life of >1x107moles methyl propionate/mole Pd are rou­tine­ly achieved on the com­mer­cial plant.

The sec­ond stage cat­a­lyst, com­posed of caesium/zirconia/silica reacts methyl pro­pi­onate with formalde­hyde at 330C and 1–2barg to form methyl methacry­late (MMA) and water. The selec­tiv­i­ty is about 93% to MMA based on methyl pro­pi­onate and over 80% on formalde­hyde fed. The pre­sen­ta­tion describes some of the steps in devel­op­ment of the cat­a­lyst includ­ing com­par­isons with cat­a­lysts for sim­i­lar process dis­closed by com­peti­tors. A dis­cus­sion of the mech­a­nism of for­ma­tion of MMA and byprod­ucts is made in terms of sur­face reac­tions between reac­tants and prod­ucts. A 2-site mod­el is pro­posed involv­ing both strong­ly basic and hydrox­ylic, weak­ly acidic sites. Reac­tions catal­ysed in byprod­uct for­ma­tion include decar­boxy­la­tions, com­bined con­den­sa­tion-decar­boxy­la­tions, hydride trans­fers and acid catal­y­sis. Lucite has found that com­pet­i­tive cat­a­lysts have the wrong bal­ance of acid­i­ty and basic­i­ty and result gen­er­al­ly in high lev­els of hydride trans­fer and acid catal­y­sis prod­ucts.

Speaker’s Biog­ra­phy — The author has a BA (Nat­ur­al Sci­ences, Chem­istry) from Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty a PhD in radi­a­tion chem­istry and car­ried out post­doc­tor­al research in LEED/XPS/UPS before join­ing ICI Ltd in 1977. With­in ICI he worked ini­tial­ly on nitrate pro­mot­ed sil­ver eth­yl­ene oxide cat­a­lysts fol­lowed by 4 years in ICI’s New Sci­ence Group study­ing the struc­ture of nov­el zeo­lites syn­the­sised by ICI co-work­ers. Since 1990 he has worked in the area of MMA process design and led the explorato­ry research team which defined the Alpha process and cur­rent­ly leads Lucite’s (for­mer­ly ICI Acrylics) chem­istry team. His cur­rent inter­ests are process improve­ment for the Alpha tech­nol­o­gy and intro­duc­tion of biotech­nol­o­gy into MMA man­u­fac­ture.

Shape Selectivity Revisited: Higher Catalytic Rates in Smaller Zeolite Channels

2011 Spring Symposium

 
Aditya Bhan
Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing and Mate­ri­als Sci­ence
Uni­ver­si­ty of Min­neso­ta
Twin Cities


Abstract — Zeo­lites are crys­talline inor­gan­ic frame­work oxides with chan­nel and pock­et dimen­sions typ­i­cal­ly small­er than 1 nanome­ter. Their con­strained envi­ron­ments are well known to select for chem­i­cal reac­tions via steric mech­a­nisms, typ­i­cal­ly, by exclu­sion of mol­e­cules or tran­si­tion states based on size. The strong effects of pore size and shape as they become com­men­su­rate with those of reac­tant species and the con­comi­tant effects on the enthalpy and entropy of adsorp­tion have also been broad­ly and con­vinc­ing­ly not­ed. We inquire instead, what are the effects of con­fine­ment in small chan­nels? In this talk, I will present three exam­ples where reac­tiv­i­ty in small 8-mem­bered ring pock­ets of H-MOR dif­fers from that in larg­er 12-mem­bered ring chan­nels of MOR.

(i) We show that the appar­ent effects of pro­ton den­si­ty and of hydrox­yl group envi­ron­ment on DME car­bony­la­tion turnover rates reflect instead the remark­able speci­fici­ty of eight-mem­bered ring zeo­lite chan­nels in accel­er­at­ing kinet­i­cal­ly rel­e­vant *CH3-CO reac­tion steps.

(ii) In zeo­lite pores large enough to accom­mo­date ethanol dimers, ethanol pref­er­en­tial­ly dehy­drates via a bimol­e­c­u­lar path­way to gen­er­ate diethyl ether since the for­ma­tion of ethanol dimer­ic species is ener­get­i­cal­ly more favor­able than the for­ma­tion of ethanol monomers. In zeo­lite chan­nels too small to accom­mo­date ethanol dimers, ethanol is selec­tive­ly dehy­drat­ed via a uni­mol­e­c­u­lar reac­tion path­way to gen­er­ate eth­yl­ene.

(iii) For iso­mer­iza­tion reac­tions of n-hexa­ne, 8-MR chan­nels of H-MOR min­i­mize the free ener­gy of required car­bo­ca­tion­ic tran­si­tion states, pos­si­bly via par­tial con­fine­ment effects that increase the entropy of the tran­si­tion state at the expense of the reac­tion enthalpy. These find­ings show that con­fine­ment in zeo­lite chan­nels influ­ences rate and selec­tiv­i­ty of hydro­car­bon reac­tions more fun­da­men­tal­ly than sim­ple con­sid­er­a­tions of size and shape.

Speaker’s Biog­ra­phy – Aditya Bhan received his Bach­e­lor of Tech­nol­o­gy (B. Tech.) in Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing from IIT Kan­pur in 2000. Sub­se­quent­ly, he moved to West Lafayette, Indi­ana and joined the group of Nick Del­gass at Pur­due, where he devel­oped micro­ki­net­ic mod­els to describe propane arom­a­ti­za­tion on pro­ton- and gal­li­um- form ZSM-5 mate­ri­als for his PhD. In 2005, he moved to the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berke­ley to pur­sue post-doc­tor­al stud­ies in Pro­fes­sor Enrique Iglesia’s group to study the kinet­ics, mech­a­nism, and site require­ments of dimethyl ether car­bony­la­tion. In Sep­tem­ber 2007, Dr. Bhan took up his present posi­tion as an Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor in the Depart­ment of Chem­i­cal Engi­neer­ing and Mate­ri­als Sci­ence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Min­neso­ta. Dr. Bhan leads a research group that focus­es on the struc­tur­al and mech­a­nis­tic char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of inor­gan­ic mol­e­c­u­lar sieve cat­a­lysts use­ful in ener­gy con­ver­sion and petro­chem­i­cal syn­the­sis. His research at Min­neso­ta has been rec­og­nized with the McK­night Land Grant Pro­fes­sor and 3M Non-tenured Fac­ul­ty awards.